flyzy博客
圣何塞的延迟吓到我了，真的
Request timeout for icmp_seq 0
64 bytes from 23.94.x.x: icmp_seq=1 ttl=42 time=820.064 ms
64 bytes from 23.94.x.x: icmp_seq=2 ttl=42 time=958.886 ms
64 bytes from 23.94.x.x: icmp_seq=3 ttl=42 time=878.496 ms
64 bytes from 23.94.x.x: icmp_seq=4 ttl=42 time=794.833 ms
64 bytes from 23.94.x.x: icmp_seq=5 ttl=42 time=918.873 ms
64 bytes from 23.94.x.x: icmp_seq=6 ttl=42 time=939.573 ms
Request timeout for icmp_seq 7
Request timeout for icmp_seq 8
64 bytes from 23.94.x.x: icmp_seq=9 ttl=42 time=820.368 ms
64 bytes from 23.94.x.x: icmp_seq=10 ttl=42 time=787.255 ms
64 bytes from 23.94.x.x: icmp_seq=11 ttl=42 time=843.994 ms
Request timeout for icmp_seq 12
64 bytes from 23.94.x.x: icmp_seq=13 ttl=42 time=886.081 ms
64 bytes from 23.94.x.x: icmp_seq=14 ttl=42 time=904.206 ms
64 bytes from 23.94.x.x: icmp_seq=15 ttl=42 time=822.989 ms
Request timeout for icmp_seq 16
64 bytes from 23.94.x.x: icmp_seq=17 ttl=42 time=654.764 ms
^C
— xxx.com ping statistics —
19 packets transmitted, 13 packets received, 31.6% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 654.764/848.491/958.886/77.103 ms
在上面搭建网站的速度
75 个请求
已传输 236 kB
536 kB 项资源
完成用时：48.39 秒
DOMContentLoaded：30.73 秒
加载时间：38.70 秒
湖南省网友说：咋了
贵州省网友说：幸好我没买
贵州省网友说：chi芝加哥速度勉强4K
浙江省网友说：估计是给新机器调试啥的
广东省网友说：64 bytes from 107.175.0.x: icmp_seq=0 ttl=50 time=158.362 ms
64 bytes from 107.175.0.x: icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=161.747 ms
64 bytes from 107.175.0.x: icmp_seq=2 ttl=50 time=158.474 ms
64 bytes from 107.175.0.x: icmp_seq=3 ttl=50 time=157.688 ms
64 bytes from 107.175.0.x: icmp_seq=4 ttl=50 time=157.062 ms
64 bytes from 107.175.0.x: icmp_seq=5 ttl=50 time=157.298 ms
64 bytes from 107.175.0.x: icmp_seq=6 ttl=50 time=158.296 ms
64 bytes from 107.175.0.x: icmp_seq=7 ttl=50 time=158.901 ms
64 bytes from 107.175.0.x: icmp_seq=8 ttl=50 time=157.084 ms
64 bytes from 107.175.0.x: icmp_seq=9 ttl=50 time=157.289 ms
64 bytes from 107.175.0.x: icmp_seq=10 ttl=50 time=157.527 ms
64 bytes from 107.175.0.x: icmp_seq=11 ttl=50 time=157.287 ms
64 bytes from 107.175.0.x: icmp_seq=12 ttl=50 time=164.240 ms
64 bytes from 107.175.0.x: icmp_seq=13 ttl=50 time=157.528 ms
64 bytes from 107.175.0.x: icmp_seq=14 ttl=50 time=157.457 ms
64 bytes from 107.175.0.x: icmp_seq=15 ttl=50 time=158.450 ms
64 bytes from 107.175.0.x: icmp_seq=16 ttl=50 time=160.923 ms
64 bytes from 107.175.0.x: icmp_seq=17 ttl=50 time=157.679 ms
64 bytes from 107.175.0.x: icmp_seq=18 ttl=50 time=157.223 ms
^C
— 107.175.0.x ping statistics —
19 packets transmitted, 19 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 157.062/158.448/164.240/1.834 ms
只是你的圣何塞炸了
湖北省网友说：VirMach白天还能用一用 晚上直接拉闸
湖北省网友说：ip段不一样，我前几周买的
辽宁省网友说：PING 107.174.*.* (107.174.*.*): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 107.174.*.*: seq=0 ttl=34 time=285.063 ms
64 bytes from 107.174.*.*: seq=1 ttl=34 time=284.755 ms
64 bytes from 107.174.*.*: seq=2 ttl=34 time=377.003 ms
64 bytes from 107.174.*.*: seq=3 ttl=34 time=284.872 ms
64 bytes from 107.174.*.*: seq=4 ttl=34 time=284.721 ms
64 bytes from 107.174.*.*: seq=5 ttl=34 time=284.243 ms
64 bytes from 107.174.*.*: seq=6 ttl=34 time=285.307 ms
64 bytes from 107.174.*.*: seq=7 ttl=34 time=284.961 ms
64 bytes from 107.174.*.*: seq=8 ttl=34 time=284.404 ms
64 bytes from 107.174.*.*: seq=9 ttl=34 time=376.088 ms
64 bytes from 107.174.*.*: seq=10 ttl=34 time=375.702 ms
64 bytes from 107.174.*.*: seq=11 ttl=34 time=284.281 ms
64 bytes from 107.174.*.*: seq=12 ttl=34 time=376.117 ms
64 bytes from 107.174.*.*: seq=13 ttl=34 time=376.041 ms
64 bytes from 107.174.*.*: seq=14 ttl=34 time=284.997 ms
64 bytes from 107.174.*.*: seq=15 ttl=34 time=376.446 ms
64 bytes from 107.174.*.*: seq=16 ttl=34 time=376.160 ms
64 bytes from 107.174.*.*: seq=17 ttl=34 time=376.054 ms
64 bytes from 107.174.*.*: seq=18 ttl=34 time=284.703 ms
64 bytes from 107.174.*.*: seq=19 ttl=34 time=284.526 ms
64 bytes from 107.174.*.*: seq=20 ttl=34 time=288.420 ms
64 bytes from 107.174.*.*: seq=21 ttl=34 time=376.381 ms
64 bytes from 107.174.*.*: seq=22 ttl=34 time=284.829 ms
64 bytes from 107.174.*.*: seq=23 ttl=34 time=376.070 ms
64 bytes from 107.174.*.*: seq=24 ttl=34 time=377.493 ms
64 bytes from 107.174.*.*: seq=25 ttl=34 time=285.296 ms
64 bytes from 107.174.*.*: seq=26 ttl=34 time=284.498 ms
64 bytes from 107.174.*.*: seq=27 ttl=34 time=376.104 ms
64 bytes from 107.174.*.*: seq=28 ttl=34 time=378.002 ms
64 bytes from 107.174.*.*: seq=29 ttl=34 time=284.847 ms
64 bytes from 107.174.*.*: seq=30 ttl=34 time=376.908 ms
64 bytes from 107.174.*.*: seq=31 ttl=34 time=286.998 ms
^C
— 107.174.*.* ping statistics —
32 packets transmitted, 32 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 284.243/325.071/378.002 ms
圣何塞苏州移动ping有点高。
安徽省网友说：噢，你和上面那个兄弟ip段一样
安徽省网友说：闪购买的还是什么
山东省网友说：192.3.117.XXX
数据包: 已发送 = 4，已接收 = 3，丢失 = 1 (25% 丢失)，
往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位):
最短 = 183ms，最长 = 184ms，平均 = 183ms
广东省网友说：买了以后，一直发现ping值比较高，然后我发现芝加哥比圣何塞快，就一直再用芝加哥。
江苏省网友说：圣何塞早就凉了
吉林省网友说：ping 107.174.253.* PING 107.174.253.* (107.174.253.*): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 107.174.253.*: seq=0 ttl=34 time=284.815 ms 64 bytes from 107.174.253.*: seq=1 ttl=34 time=284.720 ms 64 bytes from 107.174.253.*: seq=2 ttl=34 time=284.279 ms 64 bytes from 107.174.253.*: seq=3 ttl=34 time=284.095 ms 64 bytes from 107.174.253.*: seq=4 ttl=34 time=284.778 ms 64 bytes from 107.174.253.*: seq=5 ttl=34 time=377.447 ms 64 bytes from 107.174.253.*: seq=6 ttl=34 time=284.390 ms 64 bytes from 107.174.253.*: seq=7 ttl=34 time=285.071 ms 64 bytes from 107.174.253.*: seq=8 ttl=34 time=285.124 ms 64 bytes from 107.174.253.*: seq=9 ttl=34 time=284.664 ms 64 bytes from 107.174.253.*: seq=10 ttl=34 time=285.803 ms 64 bytes from 107.174.253.*: seq=11 ttl=34 time=285.226 ms 64 bytes from 107.174.253.*: seq=12 ttl=34 time=284.691 ms 64 bytes from 107.174.253.*: seq=13 ttl=34 time=376.112 ms 64 bytes from 107.174.253.*: seq=14 ttl=34 time=284.157 ms 64 bytes from 107.174.253.*: seq=15 ttl=34 time=376.638 ms 64 bytes from 107.174.253.*: seq=16 ttl=34 time=376.156 ms 64 bytes from 107.174.253.*: seq=17 ttl=34 time=285.118 ms 64 bytes from 107.174.253.*: seq=18 ttl=34 time=284.734 ms 64 bytes from 107.174.253.*: seq=19 ttl=34 time=376.424 ms 64 bytes from 107.174.253.*: seq=20 ttl=34 time=375.951 ms 64 bytes from 107.174.253.*: seq=21 ttl=34 time=284.325 ms 64 bytes from 107.174.253.*: seq=22 ttl=34 time=376.979 ms 64 bytes from 107.174.253.*: seq=23 ttl=34 time=284.546 ms 64 bytes from 107.174.253.*: seq=24 ttl=34 time=375.996 ms 64 bytes from 107.174.253.*: seq=25 ttl=34 time=284.502 ms 64 bytes from 107.174.253.*: seq=26 ttl=34 time=285.092 ms 64 bytes from 107.174.253.*: seq=27 ttl=34 time=378.715 ms 64 bytes from 107.174.253.*: seq=28 ttl=34 time=284.466 ms 64 bytes from 107.174.253.*: seq=29 ttl=34 time=285.111 ms 64 bytes from 107.174.253.*: seq=30 ttl=34 time=379.345 ms 64 bytes from 107.174.253.*: seq=31 ttl=34 time=377.717 ms 64 bytes from 107.174.253.*: seq=32 ttl=34 time=284.394 ms 64 bytes from 107.174.253.*: seq=33 ttl=34 time=376.937 ms 64 bytes from 107.174.253.*: seq=34 ttl=34 time=284.888 ms 64 bytes from 107.174.253.*: seq=35 ttl=34 time=284.661 ms 64 bytes from 107.174.253.*: seq=36 ttl=34 time=284.136 ms 64 bytes from 107.174.253.*: seq=37 ttl=34 time=284.726 ms 64 bytes from 107.174.253.*: seq=38 ttl=34 time=284.531 ms 64 bytes from 107.174.253.*: seq=39 ttl=34 time=284.053 ms ^C — 107.174.253.* ping statistics — 40 packets transmitted, 40 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max = 284.053/312.387/379.345 ms复制代码
估计邻居在捣乱吧。
福建省网友说：太夸张了……
