flyzy博客
IO凑合，网络G，CPU性能竟然也不错
这是我手里的 美中部丹佛 30刀 1核2G0.5T的小鸡跑分
如果是50刀 2核4G1T那个小鸡，配置会更加均衡
而且我看了下，竟然还有货可以买 对HH性能不满意，对servarica的IO稳定不满意的可以看看这个鸡，签名有测评和购买链接
要说不好的话，就是流量太少，这些天在给网站搬家，rclone同步备份，3天就把流量干完了
Superbench.sh — https://www.oldking.net/350.html Mode : Standard Version : 1.1.7 Usage : wget -qO- sb.oldking.net | bash ———————————————————————- CPU Model : QEMU Virtual CPU version 2.5+ CPU Cores : 1 Cores 2599.996 MHz x86_64 CPU Cache : 16384 KB OS : CentOS 7.8.2003 (64 Bit) KVM Kernel : 4.11.8-1.el7.elrepo.x86_64 Total Space : 409.0 GB / 491.0 GB Total RAM : 555 MB / 1999 MB (430 MB Buff) Total SWAP : 3 MB / 2047 MB Uptime : 21 days 16 hour 42 min Load Average : 0.32, 0.11, 0.04 TCP CC : bbr ASN & ISP : AS46844, Nexeon Technologies Organization : 365 Group LLC Location : Denver, United States / US Region : Colorado ———————————————————————- I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 600 MB/s I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 853 MB/s I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 999 MB/s Average I/O Speed : 817.3 MB/s ———————————————————————- Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency Speedtest.net 789.81 Mbit/s 794.11 Mbit/s 0.76 ms Fast.com 0.00 Mbit/s 137.2 Mbit/s – Nanjing 5G CT 281.15 Mbit/s 532.42 Mbit/s 170.62 ms Hefei 5G CT 132.44 Mbit/s 561.94 Mbit/s 174.04 ms Guangzhou 5G CT 1.69 Mbit/s 311.67 Mbit/s 193.53 ms TianJin 5G CU 255.81 Mbit/s 371.56 Mbit/s 198.47 ms Shanghai 5G CU 277.72 Mbit/s 691.61 Mbit/s 221.85 ms Guangzhou 5G CU 243.59 Mbit/s 82.47 Mbit/s 194.97 ms Wuxi 5G CM 34.40 Mbit/s 24.01 Mbit/s 292.61 ms Nanjing 5G CM 42.13 Mbit/s 103.23 Mbit/s 241.60 ms ———————————————————————- Finished in : 5 min 18 sec Timestamp : 2020-12-10 09:33:52 GMT+8 复制代码
Benchmark Run: Thu Dec 10 2020 09:34:16 – 10:02:20 1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 33661126.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 4348.0 MWIPS (9.5 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 4766.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1013375.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 282885.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1882649.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 1711646.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 317009.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 12270.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 6269.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 834.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 2411519.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 33661126.5 2884.4 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4348.0 790.5 Execl Throughput 43.0 4766.0 1108.4 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1013375.5 2559.0 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 282885.5 1709.3 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1882649.5 3245.9 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1711646.0 1375.9 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 317009.0 792.5 Process Creation 126.0 12270.5 973.8 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 6269.7 1478.7 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 834.4 1390.7 System Call Overhead 15000.0 2411519.0 1607.7 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1496.3 复制代码
台湾省网友说：还是没有hh香
福建省网友说：辛亏没有买它
hosthatch吊打
台湾省网友说：绿帽没有武德 小心
