flyzy博客
$34.05/年
KVM – 1 GIGABIT
8064MB 内存
3 CPU 核数
25GB 固态容量 (RAID 10)
16000GB 流量
纽约 水牛城 地点
1 独立 IPv4
———————————————————————-
Superbench.sh — https://www.oldking.net/350.html
Mode : Standard Version : 1.1.7
Usage : wget -qO- sb.oldking.net | bash
———————————————————————-
CPU Model : QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6)
CPU Cores : 3 Cores 2199.998 MHz x86_64
CPU Cache : 4096 KB
OS : CentOS 7.9.2009 (64 Bit) KVM
Kernel : 3.10.0-1160.42.2.el7.x86_64
Total Space : 1.7 GB / 25.0 GB
Total RAM : 178 MB / 7695 MB (189 MB Buff)
Total SWAP : 0 MB / 255 MB
Uptime : 0 days 0 hour 51 min
Load Average : 0.05, 0.03, 0.05
TCP CC : cubic
ASN & ISP : AS36352, ColoCrossing
Organization : Virtual Machine Solutions LLC
Location : Buffalo, United States / US
Region : New York
———————————————————————-
I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 85.4 MB/s
I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 102 MB/s
I/O Speed( 1.0GB ) : 110 MB/s
Average I/O Speed : 99.1 MB/s
———————————————————————-
Node Name Upload Speed Download Speed Latency
Speedtest.net 928.71 Mbit/s 430.21 Mbit/s 30.90 ms
Fast.com 0.00 Mbit/s 135.1 Mbit/s –
Hefei 5G CT 390.03 Mbit/s 289.31 Mbit/s 234.36 ms
Guangzhou 5G CT 14.81 Mbit/s 117.96 Mbit/s 232.83 ms
TianJin 5G CU 8.50 Mbit/s 43.68 Mbit/s 274.09 ms
Shanghai 5G CU 342.42 Mbit/s 359.16 Mbit/s 244.90 ms
Guangzhou 5G CU 354.62 Mbit/s 273.48 Mbit/s 249.90 ms
Tianjin 5G CM 234.32 Mbit/s 515.59 Mbit/s 351.44 ms
Wuxi 5G CM 350.41 Mbit/s 73.64 Mbit/s 291.51 ms
Nanjing 5G CM 496.98 Mbit/s 15.24 Mbit/s 270.47 ms
———————————————————————-
Finished in : 6 min 14 sec
Timestamp : 2021-09-18 10:31:12 GMT+8
Results : ./superbench.log
———————————————————————-
Share result:
· https://www.speedtest.net/result/c/ae733148-abe9-44f1-b440-67e666ccb89b
· https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/29VHvmypB2/
———————————————————————-
========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)
System: DirectSilent-VM: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux — 3.10.0-1160.42.2.el7.x86_64 — #1 SMP Tue Sep 7 14:49:57 UTC 2021
Machine: x86_64 (x86_64)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=”UTF-8″, collate=”UTF-8″)
CPU 0: QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6) (4400.0 bogomips)
x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
CPU 1: QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6) (4400.0 bogomips)
x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
CPU 2: QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6) (4400.0 bogomips)
x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
22:51:08 up 1:17, 1 user, load average: 0.01, 0.25, 0.31; runlevel 3
————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Fri Sep 17 2021 22:51:08 – 23:19:20
3 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 24896407.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 3256.0 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 502.9 lps (29.7 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 104409.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 29301.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 363553.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 155639.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 40121.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 2512.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1737.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 496.8 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 209059.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 24896407.8 2133.4
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3256.0 592.0
Execl Throughput 43.0 502.9 117.0
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 104409.1 263.7
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 29301.2 177.0
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 363553.2 626.8
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 155639.5 125.1
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 40121.3 100.3
Process Creation 126.0 2512.2 199.4
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 1737.7 409.8
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 496.8 828.0
System Call Overhead 15000.0 209059.8 139.4
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 299.0
————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Fri Sep 17 2021 23:19:20 – 23:47:40
3 CPUs in system; running 3 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 65733054.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 9582.7 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 1599.3 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 260177.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 62043.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 848817.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 478630.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 123445.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 8219.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 5624.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 779.2 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 481591.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 65733054.9 5632.7
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 9582.7 1742.3
Execl Throughput 43.0 1599.3 371.9
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 260177.6 657.0
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 62043.6 374.9
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 848817.4 1463.5
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 478630.1 384.8
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 123445.9 308.6
Process Creation 126.0 8219.4 652.3
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 5624.6 1326.5
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 779.2 1298.7
System Call Overhead 15000.0 481591.8 321.1
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 786.9
======= Script description and score comparison completed! =======
四川省网友说：这配置可以
湖北省网友说：这配置可以
四川省网友说：这Unixbench分数竟然不敌AMD 1核
安徽省网友说：去年22刀，4h8g
山西省网友说：流量给得足
甘肃省网友说：3h不抵1h，改得36刀 干啥不好 吃一顿也行
浙江省网友说：3核 比不过别人一核
签名contabo 4核3000来分
斯巴达一核也有880来分
甘肃省网友说：最大的问题就是大水牛到国内的网速
浙江省网友说：请我大佬这个怎么测试，用什么命令
江苏省网友说：我用的这两个
wget -qO- sb.oldking.net | bash
wget –no-check-certificate https://github.com/teddysun/across/raw/master/unixbench.sh
chmod +x unixbench.sh
./unixbench.sh
广东省网友说：请问这种黑五优惠机，以后续费也是优惠价吗？
福建省网友说：是的，但是感觉这个性价比不高
